(PS) Sermeno v. Butte County Probation Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20242:23-cv-02739California519 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 LARRY ALTAMIRANO SERMENO, No. 2:23-cv-02739 KJM AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER BUTTE COUNTY PROBATION

DEPARTMENT,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 25, 2024 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 21 days. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.