S.O.

S.O. v. Rescue Union S.D.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20242:23-cv-00406California798 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 S.O. a minor, by and through No. 2:23-cv-00406-DJC-AC Guardian Ad Litem, LOLITA O’NEAL, 12 Plaintiff, ORDER v.

RESCUE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Defendants seek reconsideration of Magistrate Judge Allison Claire’s April 10, 2024 Order directing disclosure of relevant requested documents in unredacted form. Judge Claire previously ordered the production of the evidence at issue on November 17, 2023. (See ECF No. 24.) Defendants did not seek reconsideration of the initial order requiring disclosure within fourteen days. “A party may serve and file objections to the order within 14 days after being served with a copy. A party may not assign as error a defect in the order not timely objected to.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). Thus, to the extent Defendants now wish to object to the substance of that order, Defendants’ Motion is untimely and those arguments are waived. 28 Judge Claire’s April 10, 2024 Order, for which Defendants are now…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.