(PS) Amiri v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20242:23-cv-01938California634 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAFAR AMIRI, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-01938-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiffs, v. ORDER U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 On April 9, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the magistrate judge are reviewed de novo by both the district court and [the appellate] court . . . .”). Having reviewed the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record. In determining whether to dismiss a case for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.