Aro Pistachios, Inc. v. Dan On Foods Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ARO PISTACHIOS, INC., Case No. 1:24-cv-00322-JLT-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING STIPULATION
OF DISMISSAL
v. (ECF No. 18) DAN ON FOODS CORPORATION, et al.,
FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Aro Pistachios, Inc. filed this action against Dan On Foods Corporation (“Dan On Foods”) and PNC Bank National Association (“PNC Bank”) on March 15, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) On June 25, 2024, Dan On Foods filed its answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 13.) PNC Bank has not filed an answer or motion for summary judgment. On August 16, 2024, Plaintiff filed a stipulation for dismissal of PNC Bank with prejudice. (ECF No. 18.) The stipulation is signed only by Plaintiff and PNC Bank. (Id. at 5.) Under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “a plaintiff has an absolute right to voluntarily dismiss his action prior to service by the defendant of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Commercial Space Mgmt. Co., Inc. v. Boeing Co., Inc.,…