Espinosa

(PC) Maraglino v. Espinosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20241:20-cv-00825California1,038 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOROTHY GRACE MARIE No. 1:20-cv-00825 AWI GSA

MARAGLINO,

ORDER AND FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. ORDER RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM

J. ESPINOSA, et al., FILING FEE

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 23)

PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS DUE

SEPTEMBER 3, 2024 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in June 2020. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. In April 2023, this case was closed. ECF Nos. 21, 22 (order adopting; judgment, respectively). Before this Court is Plaintiff’s motion for relief from filing fee. ECF No. 23. For the reasons stated below the undersigned will recommend that the motion be denied. I. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.