Hedrington

Hedrington v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20241:24-cv-00497California1,492 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ORLONZO HEDRINGTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00497-KES-SKO

Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING AND

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

(Doc. 17) Defendant. _____________________________________/

14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Orlonzo Hedrington (“Plaintiff”)’s “Rule 37, Failure to Disclosures and to Cooperate in Discovery, Motion of Sanctions,” filed August 6, 2024. (Doc. 17) Defendant United States of America (“Defendant”) filed its opposition to the motion on August 9, 2024. (Doc. 19.) After having reviewed the motion and opposition, the Court deems the motion suitable for decision without oral argument, and hearing set for August 28, 2024, will be vacated. For the reasons set forth below, the motion shall be denied without prejudice. I. BACKGROUND On April 26, 2024, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed this action against Defendant alleging that “he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.