Trate

(HC) Winston v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20241:24-cv-00182California1,514 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-0182 JLT EPG (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S

MOTION, DISMISSING PETITION FOR

v. WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS, AND

DECLINING TO ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF

B.M. TRATE, APPEALABILITY Respondent. (Docs. 21, 22) 16 LeAnthony T. Winston is a federal prisoner who proceeded pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court found it lacks jurisdiction over the petition— through which Petitioner sought to invoke the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e)— and dismissed the petition on June 5, 2024. (Doc. 19.) On July 5, 2024, Petitioner filed a motion to alter or amend the judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 19.) On July 17, 2024, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of coram nobis. (Doc. 22.) For the reasons set forth below, Petitioner’s request for relief from judgment is denied and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.