Burnes
(PC) Osuna v. Burnes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMIE OSUNA, No. 1:24-cv-00793-KES-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
v. FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED J. BURNES, et al., (ECF No. 17)
Defendants.
16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a court order to restore his access to legal books and materials, filed August 19, 2024. Plaintiff seeks a court order to restore his access to legal books and materials. The Court construes Plaintiff’s motion as a request for a preliminary injunction. I. LEGAL STANDARD The primary purpose of a preliminary injunction is preservation of the status quo. See, e.g., Ramos v. Wolf, 975 F.3d 872, 887 (9th Cir. 2020). More specifically, the purpose of a preliminary…