Krause

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ERNEST KRAUSE, et al., No. 2:23-cv-02307-DAD-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION

MANJARI CHAWLA, et al., SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants.

17 On August 2, 2024, the court issued an order granting several motions to dismiss and terminating all named defendants in this action except for defendant William Maroni, who has not appeared in this action and who, according to the docket, has not been served in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 94.) In that order, the court noted that it would address by way of separate order plaintiffs’ failure to timely serve the summons and operative complaint on defendant Maroni, who is now the sole remaining named defendant in this action. (Id. at 2 n.1, 16.) Pursuant to Rule 4, “[t]he plaintiff is responsible for having the summons and complaint served within the time…