(PC) Maraglino v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20241:20-cv-00826California654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOROTHY GRACE MARIE No. 1:20-cv-00826-KES-SAB (PC)

MARAGLINO,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RETURN OF FILING FEE BE DENIED v. (ECF No. 18) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On March 2, 2021, the instant action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was dismissed for failure to state a claim, judgment was entered, and the case was closed. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) On May 8, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for relief from the filing fees under the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). (ECF No. 18.) Plaintiff moves to modify the collection of filing fees from her inmate trust account.1 /// /// /// 26 1 Plaintiff has filed identical motions in two other cases filed in this Court in which she granted leave to proceed in 27 forma pauperis. See Maraglino v. Espinosa, No. 1:17-cv-01535 JLT BAM and Maraglino v. Espinosa, No. 1:20-cv- 00825…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.