Campbell

(HC) Quintero v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20241:23-cv-00174California673 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOEL QUINTERO, Case No. 1:23-cv-0174 JLT SAB (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

T. CAMPBELL, TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF

Respondent. APPEALABILITY (Doc. 24) 16 Joel Quintero is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, asserting two claims for relief: (1) prosecutorial misconduct and (2) sufficiency of the evidence. (See generally Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge found Petitioner was “not entitled to habeas relief” on the claims presented, because the state court’s denial of Petitioner’s claims “was not contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law, nor was it based on an unreasonable determination of fact.” (Doc. 24 at 14, 17.) In addition, the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.