Kitt

(PC) Ramirez v. Kitt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20241:17-cv-00947California6,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARMANDO RAMIREZ, Case No. 1:17-cv-00947-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT KITT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v. (ECF No. 49) KITT, Defendant. 16 I. Introduction Plaintiff Armando Ramirez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Kitt (“Defendant”) for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to United States Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 40, 43.) On March 8, 2021, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that the undisputed material facts and supporting evidence show that: he was never deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s medical needs, nor negligent in the medical treatment he rendered to Plaintiff, and nothing Defendant did or did not do caused any…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.