Warden

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Brandon R. Johnson, No. 2:23-cv-0908 KJM JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER v. Warden, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Brandon Johnson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a response to this 18 court’s order adopting in part the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations. See Resp., ECF No. 35; Prior Order (May 23, 2024), ECF No. 34. The court construes this response as a motion for reconsideration. Generally, reconsideration is appropriate if there has been an intervening change in controlling law, new evidence has become available, or it is necessary to correct clear error or prevent manifest injustice. Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of Colusa Indian Cmty. v. California, 649 F. Supp. 2d 1063, 1069 (E.D. Cal. 2009) (citing Sch. Dist. No. 1J Multnomah County, Oregon v. ACandsS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1263 (9th Cir.1993)). Here, plaintiff does not 26 argue there…