Goodwin

Goodwin v. State Farm General Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 21, 20241:24-cv-00795California4,001 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DUCHUN GOODWIN, Case No. 1:24-cv-00795-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT

v. (ECF No. 1)

STATE FARM GENERAL INSURANCE THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE COMPANY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Duchun Goodwin (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on July 9, 2024. Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT Notwithstanding any filing fee, the court shall dismiss a case if at any time the Court determines that the complaint “(i) is frivolous or malicious; (ii) fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted; or (iii) seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (section 1915(e) applies to all in forma pauperis complaints, not just those filed by prisoners); Calhoun v. Stahl, 254 F.3d 845 (9th Cir. 2001) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.