Harper

Harper v. Charter Communications, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20242:19-cv-00902California841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 LIONEL HARPER, DANIEL SINCLAIR, No. 2:19-cv-00902 WBS DMC HASSAN TURNER, LUIS VAZQUEZ, and PEDRO ABASCAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and all ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION aggrieved employees, FOR AN INDICATIVE RULING 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v.

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

18 Defendant.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 Plaintiffs Hassan Turner and Luis Vazquez (collectively 22 and interchangeably, “plaintiffs”) have moved for an indicative 23 ruling under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62.1(a). (Docket 24 No. 403.) Specifically, plaintiffs request an indicative ruling 25 from this court that it would reconsider its October 13, 2021, 26 order compelling arbitration (Docket No. 202) under Federal Rule 27 of Civil Procedure 60(b) in light of Ramirez v. Charter 28 Communications, 551 P.3d 520, 528, 531-32, 536-37, 540 (Cal. July 15, 2024), in which the Supreme Court of California found several arbitration provisions that are similar or identical to the 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.