Iqbal

Iqbal v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20242:23-cv-01299California8,559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Lailaa Iqbal, et al., No. 2:23-cv-01299-KJM-CSK. Plaintiffs, ORDER v. Antony J. Blinken, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 This action challenges the delayed adjudication of immigrant visa applications. The 18 parties voluntarily dismissed four of the six plaintiffs after two of the noncitizen beneficiary 19 plaintiffs received their visas. See First Stip. Dismissal, ECF No. 31 (dismissing plaintiffs Lailaa 20 Iqbal and Qaiser Javed); Second Stip. Dismissal, ECF No. 36 (dismissing plaintiffs Obaid Rehman and Sabah Jabeen). The remaining plaintiffs are Muhammad Hassan and Irsa Jamil. Defendants move for summary judgment and have filed a request for judicial notice. Plaintiffs 23 have separately moved to compel the full administrative record and to strike defendants’ request 24 for judicial notice. The court denies the motion for summary judgment, grants in part the motion to strike and denies…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.