Newsom

(PC) Coleman v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20242:90-cv-00520California1,066 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM SCR P Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 14 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 This matter came on for a further hearing by videoconference on the court’s July 12, 2024 order to show cause why it should not initiate proceedings to appoint a temporary receiver in this action, ECF No. 8330. Aug. 21, 2024 Minute Order, ECF No. 8362. At hearing, the court informed the parties of its intention to appoint an outside technical advisor to advise and help the court with specific questions arising from the parties’ joint proposal to the court to appoint the current receiver in Plata v. Newsom, Case No. 01-1351 JST (N.D. Cal.), J. Clark Kelso, as temporary receiver in this action, ECF No. 8347. The court’s plan assumes the Plata Receiver would entertain appointment in this case. The court has communicated with the presiding judge in Plata, Judge Tigar, who at this point has expressed no objection to this court’s considering the 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.