(SS)Keo

(SS)Keo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 22, 20241:21-cv-00807California4,226 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. Introduction

17 Plaintiff Setha Keo seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social 18 Security denying his application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social 19 Security Act.1

II. Factual and Procedural Background

21 Plaintiff applied for benefits on May 6, 2019 alleging a disability onset date of May 28, 22 2018. The Commissioner denied the applications initially on September 24, 2019, and on 23 reconsideration on December 19, 2019. AR 98, 106. Plaintiff appeared for a hearing before an 24 ALJ on January 5, 2021. AR 31–68. The ALJ issued an unfavorable decision on January 26, 25 2021. AR 12–30. The Appeals Council denied review on April 6, 2021 (AR 1–6) and this appeal 26 followed. 27 28 1 The parties did not consent to the jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. Doc. 5, 12.

III. The Disability Standard

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g), this court has the authority to review a decision by the

Commissioner denying a claimant disability benefits. “This court may set aside the

Commissioner’s denial of disability insurance benefits when the ALJ’s findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.