Newsom
(PC) Storm v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIMITRI Z. STORM, Case No. 1:24-cv-00236-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO
RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO
v. ACTION NEWSOM, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR Defendants. RESTRAINING ORDER AND
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
12 (Doc. 1)
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
15 Plaintiff Dimitri Z. Storm (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 16 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 22, 2024, the Court 17 screened Plaintiff's original complaint and found that it failed to comply with Federal Rule of 18 Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a cognizable claim for relief. The Court granted Plaintiff 19 leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days. (Doc. 9.) Concurrent with his 20 original complaint, Plaintiff sought a restraining order and a preliminary injunction. (See Doc. 1.)