(PS) Ortiz v. Portfolio Recovery Assoc., LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RENE ORTIZ; RYUN ORTIZ, No. 2:23-cv-01456-TLN-SCR Plaintiffs, v. ORDER PORTFOLIO ROCOVERY ASSOCIATION, LLC, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiffs, proceeding without counsel, initiated the above captioned civil action against Defendants. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On May 21, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations which were served on the parties, and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 125.) Plaintiffs filed objections to the findings and recommendations, which to the Court considered. (ECF No. 131.) The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist.,…