Espinosa

(PC) Maraglino v. Espinosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20241:17-cv-01535California629 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOROTHY GRACE MARIE Case No. 1:17-cv-01535 JLT BAM (PC)

MARAGLINO,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RELIEF Plaintiff, FROM FILING FEE 13 v. (Doc. 38) 14 ESPINOSA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Dorothy Grace Marie Maraglino is a state prisoner who proceeded in forma pauperis in this action. The Court dismissed the case with prejudice for failure to state a cognizable claim on May 30, 2019. (Doc. 27.) After Plaintiff appealed the dismissal, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Court on March 6, 2020. (Docs. 29, 35.) Plaintiff now seeks relief from the filing fees previously ordered in this action. (Doc. 38.) Plaintiff states that she currently has four separate cases/accounts for which the Court garnishes her prison account, including the instant action. (Doc. 38 at 1.) Plaintiff states that her debt to the Eastern District is deducted at 20% per line item, which results in greater garnishment than if all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.