Rodriguez

(PC) Howard v. Rodriguez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20241:24-cv-00285California1,614 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KARLIS RUBEN AUGUSTUS No. 1:24-cv-00285-JLT-SAB (PC)

HOWARD,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff, RECOMMENDING DENIAL OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY v. RESTRAINING ORDER 14 RODRIGUEZ, (ECF No. 19) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order, filed August 22, 2024. I. DISCUSSION This action is proceeding against Defendant Rodriguez for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. In his current motion, Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief against inmate Scott Stansell because he assaulted Plaintiff on April 7, 2023 causing physical injury. (ECF No. 19.) Since the 28 assault Plaintiff has suffered from post-traumatic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.