(HC) Potter v. State of Idaho

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ONIS CARRABINE POTTER, No. 2:23-cv-02137 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER STATE OF IDAHO, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 22, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 4. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that petitioner’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of the petitioner’s current address at all times. …