(SS) Perez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 23, 20241:21-cv-01202California302 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 SHAWNA PEREZ, No. 1:21-cv-01202-TLN-BAM Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARTIN O’MALLEY, Defendant. 14 15 16 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying her application for Supplemental Security Income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. On August 1, 2024, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which contained notice to the parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. The time to file objection has passed, and neither party filed objections. The Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the file, the Court finds the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.