CDCR

(PC) Gallegos v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20242:22-cv-01790California8,407 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BENJAMIN ROBERT GALLEGOS, No. 2:22-cv-01790-DAD-EFB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS AND

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. ECF No. 14. On March 10, 2023, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), the court determined that plaintiff’s first amended complaint (FAC) alleged a potentially cognizable Fourteenth Amendment due process claim against defendant, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) correctional counselor Ebert1 for violation of plaintiff’s right to marry. ECF Nos. 16, 19. Plaintiff elected to proceed on this claim, ECF No. 20, and the court ordered dismissal of all other claims and defendants and struck plaintiff’s improperly filed addendum. ECF Nos. 21 (striking ECF No. 17), 22, 23, 29. ////

Ebert’s full title…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.