Novoa

Smith v. Novoa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20241:24-cv-00251California456 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CANDACE SMITH, No. 1:24-cv-00251-KES-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS THIS

v. CASE DANNETTE NOVOA, et al., (Doc. 5) Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Candace Smith proceeds pro se in this civil action. The matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), which was denied without prejudice on March 4, 2024. Doc. 3. Plaintiff was ordered to submit a long form IFP application or pay the applicable filing fee within 45 days. Id. at 3. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s order could result in dismissal of the action. Id. at 4. Plaintiff failed to submit a long form IFP application, pay the filing, or otherwise respond to the court’s March 4, 2024 order. On May 1, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.