Ingram

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH LEE TAYLOR, No. 2:21-cv-01042 TLN SCR P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARSHA INGRAM, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Having considered plaintiff’s pending motions (ECF No. 59, 62, 64), the court grants plaintiff an extension of time to oppose defendant’s motion for summary judgment but otherwise denies those motions, as explained below. Plaintiff seeks a stay of the proceedings, or, in the alternative, requests an extension of time up to and including October 14, 2024, to oppose defendant Ingram’s motion for summary judgment, due to a medical issue. (ECF Nos. 62, 64.) Defendant Ingram filed a written opposition to the second motion, arguing plaintiff fails to show excusable neglect, in part, because plaintiff’s medical issue occurred long after his opposition was due. (ECF No. 65 at 3-8.) Defendant argues plaintiff could have filed…