Brinton

(PC) Saenz v. Brinton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 26, 20241:23-cv-01303California864 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT G. SAENZ, Case No. 1:23-cv-01303-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT (ECF No. 31) BRINTON, et al.,

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

Defendants. FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT LODGED

ON AUGUST 22, 2024 AS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF No. 30)

ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 29, 2024

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (ECF No. 22) 19 Plaintiff Robert G. Saenz (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On February 29, 2024, the Court screened the first amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that this action be dismissed for failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted because it is barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 482 (1994). (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.