Campbell

(HC) Ward v. Campbell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20242:23-cv-02175California726 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH VINCENT WARD, No. 2:23-cv-02175-DAD-CSK (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

T. CAMPBELL, (Doc. Nos. 27, 30) Respondent.

16 Petitioner Joseph Vincent Ward is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 18, 2024, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 19) and dismissed petitioner’s federal habeas petition with prejudice. (Doc. No. 22 at 2–3.) Judgment was entered on that same day. (Doc. No. 23.) On August 5, 2024, petitioner appealed the court’s order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (Doc. No. 24) and filed the pending motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his petition. (Doc. No. 27). …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.