Bird

(HC) Scott v. Bird

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20242:23-cv-00936California854 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS CHARLES SCOTT, No. 2:23-cv-00936-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

LANDON BIRD, (Doc. Nos. 29, 33) Respondent.

16 Petitioner Thomas Charles Scott is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 17, 2024, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 22) and dismissed petitioner’s federal habeas petition without prejudice. (Doc. No. 27 at 2–3.) Judgment was entered on that same day. (Doc. No. 28.) On August 15, 2024, petitioner appealed the court’s order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. (Doc. No. 30.) On August 9, 2024, petitioner filed the pending motion for reconsideration of the court’s order dismissing his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.