(PC) Van Huisen v. Nelson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20242:24-cv-00083California486 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY SCOTT VAN HUSIEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00083-DJC-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. THAT THE CLERK OF COURT BE

DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS MATTER

BILL NELSON,

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

Defendants. DAYS 16 Plaintiff is a “Three-Striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Van Husien v. Chief of Staff, No. 2:23-cv-02815-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. April 3, 2024) (denying plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis because plaintiff is a Three Striker). Accordingly, on May 2, 2024, I recommended that plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff was allowed fourteen days to file objections. Id. at 3. I also recommended that plaintiff be directed to tender the filing fee within thirty days of any order adopting these recommendations. Id. Plaintiff neither filed objections nor tendered the filing fee. On June 27, 2024, the district judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.