Troncoso
Troncoso v. McLane/Suneast, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 EDWIN TRONCOSO, No. 1:24-cv-00568-KES-SAB Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING GRANTING
v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REMAND MCLANE/SUNEAST, INC., et al (ECF No. 14) Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
15 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Edwin Troncoso’s motion to remand. A hearing on the motion was held on August 21, 2024. Counsel Sheryl Marx appeared by videoconference on behalf of Plaintiff. Counsel Sylvia Kim appeared by videoconference on behalf of Defendant McLane/Suneast, Inc. Having considered the arguments made at the hearing, the moving and opposition papers, as well as the Court’s file, the Court recommends Plaintiff’s motion be granted and the case be remanded to Merced County Superior Court. I. BACKGROUND On April 5, 2024, Plaintiff filed this action in Merced County Superior Court against his 25 …