(PS) Van den Heuvel v. Office Max

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, Case No. 2:24-cv-01026-DAD-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER v. GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

OFFICE MAX, et al.,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendants.

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

CLAIM

17 ECF Nos. 1 & 2

FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff proceeds pro se against defendants Office Max and Office Depot, but his complaint is incomprehensible. The allegations are unintelligible and bereft of substance, and I find it would be futile to offer plaintiff an opportunity to amend. I will grant his application to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 2, which makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(a)(1) and (2), and recommend that this action be dismissed. Screening and Pleading Requirements A federal court must screen the complaint of any claimant seeking permission to…