(PS) Rogers v. County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KIM EDWARD ROGERS, No. 2:24-cv-00387-DAD-SCR (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. Local Rule 302(c)(21). Pending before the undersigned are Plaintiff’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and for a temporary restraining order (ECF No. 3). Based on the analysis below, the undersigned recommends that Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) be denied without prejudice, and Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order (ECF No. 3) be denied. I. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis A pro se plaintiff may commence an action without paying the filing fees where the plaintiff “submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such [person1] possesses that 26 “Person” has been substituted for…