Martinez

(PC) Brummett v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20241:21-cv-00086California1,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MELVIN RAY BRUMMETT, JR., Case No. 1:21-cv-00086-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SANCTIONS AGAINST

v. DEFENDANT’S ATTORNEY OF RECORD

MARTINEZ, (ECF No. 122)

Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Melvin Ray Brummett, Jr. (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 105.) This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Martinez (“Defendant”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference to risk of harm in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The case is set for a jury trial commencing October 16, 2024, before the undersigned. I. Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions against Defendant’s attorney of record, Christopher H. Findley,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.