Jones

(PC) Heyligar v. Jones

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20242:23-cv-01899California1,104 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARLINGTON ANSELMO HEYLIGAR, No. 2:23-cv-1899 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND REVISED SCHEDULING

ORDER

JONES, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis. Defendants filed an ex parte application for a first extension of time to complete discovery and file a dispositive motion. Defendants initially requested that the deadlines be extended by ninety days, but subsequently amended their request to seek sixty days. After further briefing from the parties, the Court grants defendants’ request for a sixty day extension of the discovery and pretrial motions deadlines. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff, who identifies as transgender, filed this action on September 5, 2023. (ECF No. 1.) This action proceeds on plaintiff’s claims that on July 10, 2022, defendants T. Jones, E. Corter, and O. Beltran used excessive force (Claim I), and defendant Richards was deliberately indifferent to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.