Zuniga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KATHERINE L. ZUNIGA, Case No. 1:24-cv-00673-KES-EPG Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

JOINT MOTION FOR PROPOSED

TRANS UNION, LLC, et al., STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Defendants. (ECF No. 23) 15 16 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion for the Court to approve their 17 proposed stipulated protective order. (ECF No. 23). Upon review, the Court will deny the motion 18 without prejudice. 19 Among other things, the proposed order fails to address Local Rule 141.1(c), which sets 20 out various requirements for a protective order. For example, the parties define “confidential” to 21 mean “a document reasonably designated as confidential under th[e] protective order” and they 22 propose to permit a document to be deemed confidential “if the party or non-party reasonably contends that it contains confidential or proprietary information.” (ECF No. 23, pp. 5-6). But such provisions improperly allow the parties to deem…