DeMaria
DeMaria v. Yolo County Sheriff's Office
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 CHRISTINE DEMARIA, et al., Case No. 2:23-cv-01798-KJM-CSK Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MODIFIED
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
v. (ECF No. 37) YOLO COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 16 Defendants.
19 The Court has reviewed the parties’ stipulated protective order below (ECF No. 20 37), and finds it comports with the relevant authorities and the Court’s Local Rule. See L.R. 141.1. The Court APPROVES the protective order, subject to the following 23 clarification. 24 The Court’s Local Rules indicate that once an action is closed, it “will not retain 25 jurisdiction over enforcement of the terms of any protective order filed in that action.” L.R. 26 141.1(f); see Bylin Heating Sys., Inc. v. Thermal Techs., Inc., 2012 WL 13237584, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2012) (noting that courts in the district generally do not retain -1- 1 || jurisdiction for disputes concerning protective orders after closure of the case). Thus, the 2 Court will not retain jurisdiction over this protective order once the case is…