Perimeter Solutions, L.P. v. Fortress North America, L.L.C.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20242:24-cv-01276California1,545 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PERIMETER SOLUTIONS, L.P., No. 2:24-cv-01276-DAD-CSK Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

TO SEAL EXHIBIT B TO ITS COMPLAINT

FORTRESS NORTH AMERICA, L.L.C., (Doc. No. 5) Defendant.

16 On May 2, 2024, plaintiff Perimeter Solutions, L.P. filed a notice of its request to seal an employment agreement (“the Agreement”), which it attached as exhibit B to its complaint. (Doc. No. 5.) On June 13, 2024, the court directed defendant Fortress North America, L.L.C. either to file a statement of non-opposition to the pending request to seal or to submit an opposition to plaintiff’s request to seal in the manner prescribed by Local Rule 141(c). (Doc. No. 14.) Defendant timely filed its opposition to the request to seal on June 27, 2024. (Doc. No. 21.) For the reasons explained below, the court will deny plaintiff’s request to seal exhibit B to its complaint. /////

That same day, defendant filed a notice of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.