Davis

Smith v. Davis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20241:24-cv-00476California1,242 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 CANDACE SMITH, 1:24-cv-00476-JLT-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO v. DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT

KATHY DAVIS, PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO COMPLY Defendant. WITH COURT’S ORDERS

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

DAYS

Plaintiff Candace Smith is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For reasons stated below, the Court recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff commenced this action on April 22, 2024. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint on June 27, 2024. (ECF No. 6). As stated in the Court’s screening order, “It is not clear what Plaintiff alleges and against whom,” but the complaint generally appears to allege that Kathy Davis, a “DMV judge,”…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.