Sheehan

(PC) Trevino v. Sheehan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20242:23-cv-00235California375 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 ROBERT TREVINO, Case No. 2:23-cv-00235-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO ADD EXHIBITS TO SECOND

v. AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DIRECTING

PLAINTIFF TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED

X. SHEEHAN, et al., COMPLAINT Defendants. ECF Nos. 18 & 19 17 18 Plaintiff alleges various violations of his rights in connection with a denial of parole. ECF No. 18 at 5. Before I screened the most recent complaint, however, plaintiff filed a motion seeking to add additional exhibits to the complaint. ECF No. 19. Generally, a complaint, should be complete in itself without reference to other filings. See Goodbar v. Paldara, No. 1:21-cv- 01811-GSA-PC, 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83423, 2022 WL 1462142, at *1 (E.D. Cal. May 9, 2022) (“Under Rule 220, Plaintiff may not amend the Complaint by adding new information submitted separately from the Complaint. [Instead], Plaintiff must file an amended complaint 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.