(SS) Holmes v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 28, 20241:23-cv-01279California6,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRYSTAL HOLMES, No. 1:23-cv-01279-WBS-SKO

Petitioner, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED AND THE ACTION BE

MARTIN O’MALLEY, REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

SECURITY,

Defendant. 14-DAY DEADLINE

17 (Doc. 1) 18 19 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Chrystal Holmes (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits (“DIB”) under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1). The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate 26 1 On December 20, 2023, Martin O’Malley was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.