CDCR
(PC) Glass v. CDCR
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONALD GLASS, No. 2:20-cv-1123 DJC CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CDCR, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a California prisoner proceeding pro se with an action for violation of civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. During the relevant time frame, defendants were employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) at California State Prison, Sacramento (CSP-Sac.). This action proceeds on the following claims: 1. Claims arising under the Eighth Amendment against defendants Oania, Musgrave, and Temple for either causing plaintiff not to receive or denying plaintiff any food for a period of 4 days. 2. Claims arising under the First Amendment based upon retaliation for protected conduct against defendants Oania, Musgrave, and Temple. Defendants Oania, Musgrave, and Temple have filed a motion for summary judgment which is now before the court. /////…