Trate

(HC) Winston v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 27, 20241:24-cv-00837California2,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LEANTHONY T. WINSTON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00837-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

ASSIGN CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

B.M. TRATE, DISMISS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM1

Respondents. (Doc. No. 1)

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY MOTIONS FOR TEMPORARY

RESTRAINING ORDER AND

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION (Doc. Nos. 3, 7) FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

21 22 Petitioner LeAnthony T. Winston, a federal prisoner, is proceeding pro se on his petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 and docketed on July 19, 2024. (Doc. No. 1, “Petition”). Petitioner simultaneously filed a motion for temporary restraining order. (Doc. No. 3, “TRO Motion”). Respondent filed an opposition to the motion for temporary 27 1 This matter…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.