Warden

(PC) Beeson v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20242:23-cv-01621California316 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAYLOR A. BEESON, No. 2:23-cv-1621 DJC CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS WARDEN, F.C.I. HERLONG, Defendants. 16 On July 19, 2024, the court ordered plaintiff to complete and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on defendant Birtwell. That thirty- day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way to the court’s order. Although it appears from the docket that plaintiff’s copy of the July 19, 2024, order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.