Bick

(PC) Eckstrom v. Bick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20242:23-cv-01488California1,216 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL ECKSTROM, No. 2:23-cv-1488 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS BICK, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil action and seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). For the reasons stated below, the undersigned recommends the plaintiff’s in forma pauperis application (ECF No. 2) be denied. I. Three Strikes Analysis Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) permits any court of the United States to authorize the commencement and prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person who submits an affidavit indicating that the person is unable to pay such fees. However,

[i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgement in a civil action or proceeding under this section if…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.