(PC) Doe v. Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, No. 2:24-cv-1542 DJC AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER MARCUS JOHNSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties have filed a stipulation for an extension of time for defendants Macomber, Hickethier, Gonzalez, Parker, Kent, and Montes to respond to the first amended complaint and to file any objections or a stipulation to the motion to proceed under a pseudonym. ECF No. 17. The request will be granted as to the time to file objections to the motion to proceed under a pseudonym. However, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity,” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a), regardless of whether plaintiff is represented by counsel, In re Prison Litig. Reform Act, 105 F.3d 1131, 1134 (6th Cir. 1997)…