Estate of Derrick Austin v. Kern County Sheriffs Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20241:24-cv-00647California969 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ESTATE OF DERRICK AUSTIN, et al., Case No. 1:24-cv-00647-KES-CDB

Plaintiffs,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED

v.

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE THIS ACTION AND TO

KERN COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al.,

COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

Defendants.

ORDER CONTINUING THE

MANDATORY SCHEDULING

CONFERENCE

ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF THIS ORDER AND

TO FILE PROOF OF SERVICE

FIVE-DAY DEADLINE

20 21 Background Plaintiffs Estate of Derrick Austin, and Lillie Wolfe and James Ledford, as successors in interest and individually (“Plaintiffs”), initiated this action with the filing of a complaint on May 31, 2024. (Doc. 1). On June 3, 2024, the Clerk of the Court issued summonses and the Court entered an order setting a mandatory scheduling conference on September 4, 2024. (Docs. 2-3). The Court’s order directed Plaintiffs to “diligently pursue service of summons and complaint” and “promptly file proofs of service.” (Doc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.