Stoller

(PC) Nguyen v. Stoller

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 30, 20242:23-cv-01157California297 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAI NGUYEN, No. 2:23-CV-1157-WBS-DMC-P Plaintiff, Court of Appeals No. 24-5142

v.

ORDER

JOHN STOLLER, et al., Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Final judgment was entered on July 22, 2024, and this case is closed. Plaintiff has appealed. The matter was referred to the undersigned by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to certify whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad faith, in which case in forma pauperis status would be revoked. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); see also Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 (9th Cir. 2002). Having reviewed the entire file, the Court concludes in forma pauperis status should be revoked because, for the reasons discussed in detail in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations of June 17, 2024 (Docket No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.