Warden
(HC) Taylor v. Warden
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR TAYLOR, No. 2:24-cv-01675 CSK P Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA MEDICAL
FACILITY,
15 Respondent.
17 Petitioner is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the following reasons, petitioner is granted thirty days to file a motion to stay this action in order to return to state court and exhaust his unexhausted claims. On June 11, 2024, petitioner opened this action by filing a complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) On June 17, 2024, this Court construed this action as a habeas corpus petition because petitioner appeared to challenge the validity of his conviction. (ECF No. 4.) This Court granted petitioner thirty days to file a habeas corpus petition and a complete 26 Petitioner names the California Medical Facility as respondent. (ECF No. 8 at 1.) This Court substitutes the Warden of the California Medical…